<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Builders v. Insurance Pollution Exclusion on Chinese Drywall Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinesedrywallblog.com/2009/04/home-builders-v-insurance-pollution-exclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinesedrywallblog.com/2009/04/home-builders-v-insurance-pollution-exclusion/</link>
	<description>Wolfe Law Group - Louisiana and Washington Construction Lawyers Providing Chinese Drywall Defense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chinese Drywall? Make A Claim with Homeowners Insurance&#8230;And Do It Quickly. &#124; Construction Law Monitor</title>
		<link>http://chinesedrywallblog.com/2009/04/home-builders-v-insurance-pollution-exclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinese Drywall? Make A Claim with Homeowners Insurance&#8230;And Do It Quickly. &#124; Construction Law Monitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesedrywallblog.com/?p=110#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>[...] We suggested in the past that Louisiana homeowners may have a better case than homeowners in other states, because of Louisiana&#8217;s narrow interpretation of the pollution exclusions applicability. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We suggested in the past that Louisiana homeowners may have a better case than homeowners in other states, because of Louisiana&#8217;s narrow interpretation of the pollution exclusions applicability. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radarrunner1</title>
		<link>http://chinesedrywallblog.com/2009/04/home-builders-v-insurance-pollution-exclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>radarrunner1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesedrywallblog.com/?p=110#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>Anyone denied insurance claim for replacement of Chinese drywall should contact Louiaiana Insurance Comm. office and give documentation of denial of claim based on pollution clause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone denied insurance claim for replacement of Chinese drywall should contact Louiaiana Insurance Comm. office and give documentation of denial of claim based on pollution clause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pollution Exclusion at Center of 5th Circuit Decision this Week &#171; Chinese Drywall Blog</title>
		<link>http://chinesedrywallblog.com/2009/04/home-builders-v-insurance-pollution-exclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Pollution Exclusion at Center of 5th Circuit Decision this Week &#171; Chinese Drywall Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesedrywallblog.com/?p=110#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] for example, like Louisiana.  As we reviewed just last week, Louisiana courts have taken a completely different approach from Texas to interpreting pollution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for example, like Louisiana.  As we reviewed just last week, Louisiana courts have taken a completely different approach from Texas to interpreting pollution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
